I fake up with Today
I thought the current attitude in the world was for women to
be paid the same amount as men especially if they do the same job. It appears
that Lisa Wilkinson has not only bucked that trend but proven why the “gender
pay gap’ is nothing but a load of 3rd wave feminist rubbish. This week
Lisa Wilkinson, complaining about her seemingly small 1.8 million dollar pay
packet, compared to ‘Today’ show
Co-host Karl Stefanovic’s 2 million, she left Chanel 9. Many have attributed her
actions to ‘standing up for gender equality’ ( and there’s the fucking
word again) but what seemed to escape many media outlets is that she wasn’t
after the same amount as Stefanovic for essentially less work, but she was actually
after more money, a cosy 2.3 million. Despite this, she has essentially leased
herself out to a lot more offers, such as her employment as Editor at large by
the Huffington Post, and appearing in commercials for vitamin supplements. Her contributions
on the Huffington post restrict her from posting news for Channel 9 as an
apolitical
Quite simply, she wasn’t paid less as a co host of ‘Today’ purely because she’s a woman,
but because she was less of an employment asset to Channel 9. Karl Stefanovic
has not only been a host of the today show for over 10 years, but also lends
himself to multiple other shows on Channel 9, notably “The Verdict”, a news
panel discussion show, and A Current Affair. Wilkinson’s involvement with channel
9 rarely went further than the today show itself. Apart from the occasional monologue
with the TV Week Logies or the guest appearance at ch9’s coverage and party for
New Years Eve, he association with the network is fairly modelled on her
involvement with the one morning show. She’s now been given a position with channel
10 and her 2.3 million demands met, with her new employment with channel 10 coming
45 minutes after her resignation. With news of Wilkinson’s resignation from the
Nine Network rapidly spreading, hosts of CH10’s The Project were quick to congratulate and welcome Wilkinson
to the network, with Carrie Bickmore’s smug “ .. Channel 9’s loss is our gain...”.
Politically she’s already become the poster child for the breaching of the
gender pay gap with Bill Shorten, ABC News and other feminist commentators for
supposedly standing up for women’s rights and fighting against the gender pay
gap. If anything pushing this Dangerous agenda and paying women more money for
less work is only hurting and further propagating the idea that women are
supposedly weaker. It makes women look like they have an undeserved self sense
of importance which alone they demand requires more money. This agenda alone is
only polarising the sexes in the work place and is only perfectly summed up but
the world of tennis, where women only engage in at most 60% of the work for the
same money as their male counterparts.
I myself am opposed to this behaviour. I wouldn’t want any
one paid differently for the same work. However, it must be the same work. I believe
in a meritocracy, where people are judged and awarded based on their abilities as
opposed to their mere existence. I also believe that one should celebrate their
differences. I don’t ever believe that the world is an equal place. There are
many instances in nature where the lifestyles of the different sexes aren’t equal,
and because of that I believe that we should celebrate what makes us different,
not try and pool us all together under that sickly word of ‘equality’. It has been
proven time and time again that women prefer working with people and men like
working with things. In addition to this, men are typically physically stronger
and more athletic, women have the ability to rate and nurture life. Wilkinson’s
tantrumic behaviour regarding her pay has not helped her cause, or the cause of
feminists. Rather it has purely damaged the reputation of those who seek
equality. Her resignation from Channel 9 is nothing more than a juvenile dummy
spit. Quite simply, Ms Wilkinson, either do the same work and dedicate yourself
to your employer to the same degree or don’t expect the same pay. Her behaviour
has put her in the same whiny league a Hilary Clinton, who’s year long tantrum
regarding the election is now starting to alienate herself from her peers and
her cause. Wilkinson’s behaviour can only be explained when compared to that of
her husband, Australian Republican Movement leader Peter Fitzsimmons, who
openly uses any platform to complain about his ideals for Australian leadership
under a republic at a round table pub discussion regarding the future of Rugby
Union.
Lisa Wilkinson, I invite you to have a good, long, hard look
at yourself, re-evaluate your ‘Chandon-Socialist’ ways and grow up. Carry
yourself with the dignity of your former co-host and be more realistic about
your ways. Otherwise your future ventures will surely be doomed for failure.
Comments
Post a Comment